Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill :)
Here is the one thing that makes me tend to believe Tuckers testimony if
he ever has to testify, is knowing there is a clause in his agreement if
he is caught lying he voids the plea and will go to jail. That's a
pretty big price to pay for lying, and that is something most people are
not willing to do.
William J. Foristal wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
> Hi Kathy,
>
> IMO, the problem is that Starr has had plenty of other witnesses testify
> that have been destroyed with respect to credibility after the fact. So
> I think the public, rather than thinking something is happening, is
> beginning to wonder how credible the next witness will be.
>
> And trading testimony for leniency on a conviction is probably enough to
> destroy the credibility of someone like Tucker. Just as trying to sell
> her story for big bucks has destroyed Willey's credibility for many
> people. The implication is that a made up story might bring more money
> than the truth.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 11:32:14 -0500 Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
