Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Steve,
I tend to think so. Common sense also comes into the reasoning, if
someone is going to break into a house which will they choose? The one
where they know the owner has a gun or where they know the owner
doesn't? Of course they're going to go to the house free of guns. No use
risking getting shot when they can go to another area and accomplish the
same thing with less chance of being harmed.
Steve Wright wrote:
> Thats really interesting coming from a country with little gun ownership
> (just sport and drug dealers), do you think that violent criminals just do
> there business elsewhere?
>
> Steve
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
