Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie :)
I'm not able to answer your question, I don't know. I've never been
asked by my insurance agent if we were gun owners or not, now I don't
tell them about the snakes just in case they decide to charge me extra
for having them. That's a interesting question though.
Jackie Fellows wrote:
> Hi Kathy
>
> Little off-topic but pertinent I think. Do the insurance companies charge more
> to the householder that has guns in his/her house?? I know they do if people
> have breeds of dogs that are considered guard dogs (no matter if they are
> trained to be guard dogs or not). This strikes me as strange as you pay less if
> you have a security system (which only works after the robber has entered the
> house), but you pay more for a security system that usually works before the
> robber enters the home. Does the same hold true for having a gun for
> protection??
>
> jackief
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
