[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
I don't always bother acknowledging epistemological arguments about the
nature of truth when stating facts. I will admit we cannot fully know the
earth is round, that Al Capone was a racketeer and that Clarence Thomas is a
perjurer. Sometimes close is good enough.
Your modesty is enchanting but your flawless performance on the test has to
be acknowledged by your admission you read it. We know this with Cartesian
certainty because it is obvious you think despite your efforts to obscure
that fact.
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Terry
>
>I really don't know where you are coming from--I said I believed--not that he
>was--but that I believed was a liar. Nowhere did I acknowledge or say he was a
>perjuror. Yes you are free to say any ole thing you want, but when you are
>discussing something to provide evidence for your view, you don't state as
a fact
>that the man was a perjuror. In a discussion like this, perjuror has a whole
>different meaning.
>
>LOL--that is why I flunked your test--the decision on whether I passed or
not was
>yours to make--purely a subjective decision, I would say. But I believed I
flunked,
>therefore because I believed that was the truth, I am telling the truth
when I say I
>flunked. Sorry a score of -0.
>
>jackief
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Hi Jackie,
>>
>> There is nothing in our tradition or Constitution that requires that we not
>> speak plainly. If I choose to call Al Capone a racketeer, Andrew Cunanan a
>> serial murderer, Clarence Thomas a perjurer, Bill Clinton an adulterer it is
>> idiocy to claim I am doing something wrong because they were never tried and
>> convicted of these things. A perjurer is a felon who lies under oath about
>> a material matter. Justice Thomas did that as you acknowledge. Why should
>> we not speak plainly? If he feels he is grievously wronged he can sue.
>>
>> How would you know you flunked the test if you did not know the answers? I
>> congratulate you on 100%.
>>
>> >Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >In the sociology room the children learn
>> >that even dreams are colored by your perspective
>> >
>> >I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>> >
>> >
>> Best, Terry
>>
>> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>
>
>--
>In the sociology room the children learn
>that even dreams are colored by your perspective
>
>I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
