Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
I don't think she did have anything to do with Paula Jones or any of the
other cases, but they seem to be all intertwined in a way, although they
are separate. Maybe I just feel that way because the same prosecutor is
in charge of them all.
I'm glad you saw that interview too, as it isn't on the web any longer.
:)
Sue
>
> Hi Terry
>
> Did you watch the interview with Susan McDougal? I don't know where you got your
> information, but she said that the only way she could walk out was to tell the
> story the way Starr wanted her to--not to agree to testify, but to testify the way
> he wanted.
>
> She said if she did that and testified the way Starr wanted the story that she
> would be open to perjury, not open to perjury for telling the truth.
>
> Hi Sue: I don't think Susan can do anything as she was a witness for Whitewater, I
> think. Did she have anything to do with the Paula Jones fiasco?
>
> jackief
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
