Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
Tonight on Dateline the publisher woman is going to give her side of the
story.
They had excerpts this morning on the Today show and she certainly is
defending Linda Tripp to the max. I only got to see a little of it this
morning, but it looks like it will be pretty good. She certainly is
quite frank about her feelings in regards to all of this. She came
right out and said that she really enjoys being in the thick of the
whole thing, "being a player is great fun", as she put it.
I agree I don't see Starr indicting Monica. And I don't see congress
kicking Clinton out. Public opinion is too much on the side of
Clinton. They may not like the man, as the polls say, but they do
approve of the job he is doing.
Sue
Sue
> Hi Sue,
>
> Clearly Starr has no case against Lewinsky unless he can get
> corroborating evidence to show that she DID have sex with Clinton and
> that Clinton told her to lie about it. Her affadavit given under oath
> states that she did not have sex with Clinton. All she has to testify in
> defense of any indictment is that her statements to Tripp amounted to an
> immature woman's bragging to a person who loved gossip and made a great
> audience by reacting with wide eyes and open mouth. There is no crime in
> bragging to someone an lying when not under oath. So to indict her would
> be more ridiculous than what Starr has done already.
>
> IMO, based on what the public has been told, no indictments will be
> forthcoming and Starr will send his report to Congress and that will be
> the end of it. The lawyers get rich and the taxpayers get a bit poorer.
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
