[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Since the affidavits and depositions were taken under oath there could be
an indictment for perjury if evidence is found that someone lied under
oath. There could also be an indictment of obstruction of justice if
evidence can be found to prove someone encouraged a witness to lie under
oath. IMO, Lewinsky may be in danger of indictment for obstruction.
Unless they find some corroborating evidence against Clinton there is no
chance he will be indicted or impeached for perjury or obstruction of
justice.
Bill
On Mon, 06 Apr 1998 11:36:50 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>Thanks. :) I knew it was a far out idea, but just was wondering.
>
>Also I have been wondering about something else, just as far out.
>Since
>the affidavits involved in this whole thing (where Clinton supposidly
>lied) were part of the Jones case, and that case has been thrown out,
>are the affidavits still valid. Or were they thrown out along with
>the
>case? I hope I am getting my question across. <BG>
>
>Sue
>>
>> Hi Sue,
>>
>> No, she would have no grounds for a lawsuit because her contempt of
>court
>> was well within the law. She was held in contempt for refusing to
>> testify before the Grand Jury after being given use immunity. In
>those
>> cases the person has no choice. Testify or be held in contempt.
>>
>> Bill
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
