[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Hi Mac,

>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>> You said, like others, you are "reserving judgment" and then you turn around
>> and say "there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations."  You have
>> obviously bought the line about the famous vast rightwing conspiracy.  Kind
>> of like giving the lying bitches a fair trial before hanging them.  Your
>> objectivity is very dubious IMO.
>
>No I have come to my own opinion as to who has fueled the allegations. The
factssupport
>that opinion. Look into the history of the case and see where and how it began
>and follow the trail from there. It's a nasty political battle and many are
being used as
>pawns to advance an agenda. You can dance all around it but it doesn't go away.

Thank you.  You proved my point better than I could.

>> >PJ has told many stories
>>
>> Paula Jones has told one story.  The efforts to find discrepancies are
>> laughable, e.g. how far did Clinton run his hand up her leg?, was it the
>> crotch or pelvic area?, why didn't she describe a certain deformity in
>> Clinton's anatomy to her first lawyer?  Her story may, in fact, have been
>> massaged to have Clinton blocking her way in leaving but her very first
>> affidavit is little different from any story she has ever told.
>
>I believe it started out as the hem of her skirt then she was wearing
coulottes andthe
>hand went higher. Massage the truth? Is that like embelishing...adding to..etc.
>Your whole arguement and credibility just went down the toilet. Don't forget to
>jiggle the handle.

>> >and her complaint took on a life of its own.
>>
>> ?  Her complaint has remained the same and quite consistent.
>
>Wrong again Terry. How about that little addition in the end about her
adversion to
>sex?That didn't come out until very late...two kids late..and from an
unqualified doctor.

The last is not Jones' story.  The story about Clinton's sexual assault has
not changed.  I don't blame you for trying to drag in specious additions.

>> >There is only one truth and there is no need to change it. The president
>> denied >these allegations
>>
>> Now there is a person who has told varying stories even when answering
>> briefly. He can't remember but he can remember he didn't do it.  His stories
>> have wandered all over the lot.  His story about Gennifer Flowers is the
>> funniest.  He would never have been nominated without his steadfast denial
>> about ever having an affair with Gennifer.  She was the "woman he never
>> slept with" during the campaign.  Then he admitted under oath one time
>> bedding her but now the latest spin is that he really didn't, it was just
>> one of those awful things that
>> the lawyers included as sex acts.  Nailing this piece of jello to the wall
>> is not easy.
>
>Try super glue.

Doesn't work well on greasy surfaces surfaces.

>> >and IMO is listening to good advice. His adversaries have done him more
>> good >than harm.
>>
>> ROTFL!
>
>Stay down.
>
>>
>
>>
>>
>> Those Lewinsky tapes are going to put him right up there with Howard Stern.
>
>Maybe.. but I think not. The whole mess is already on a long decline and
willfizzle away
>in due time.
>
>>
>>
>> >They have tried to use sex as a weapon and have failed in the eyes of the
>> >people.  So far the double standard still lies with you.
>>
>> I have no double standard.
>
>BULLSHIT!

Yes they do.

>>  I don't think women should be molested.  Period.

>Neither do I

Just certain ones.

>> Adultery?  I don't condone it but I leave it to the people involved
>
>Good one!
>
>> .  I am against covering up crime.
>
>It must be hard living up to your double standards.
>
>>  Where is your double standard.
>
>I never had one.
>
>> What the hell are your standards?
>
>Alot higher than yours obviously.
>
>>
>>
>> >> >> Nixon, after all this time, has been exposed as a crude
>> >> >> amateur compared to the current occupant of the White House.
>> >> >
>> >> >I think Nixon was a pro and hardly crude.
>> >>
>> >> There were a lot expletives deleted as I recall.
>> >
>> >What are you referring to?...Mac
>>
>> The "pro" Nixon taped himself committing crimes and showed himself to be a
>> boorish, foulmouthed idiot.  The tapes were unfit for family audiences.
>> Surely you must remember the numerous expletives deleted.
>
>I didn't hear what was deleted...someone must have deleted them.
>
>>
>
>...Mac
>" Idiot wind...blowing every time you move your mouth..." --Bob Dylan
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>
Best,     Terry 

"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law"  - The Devil's Dictionary 



Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to