Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Hi Bill

I think the press conference was held in an attempt to change the image by
removing Susan from being the spokesperson.  It sounds like the lawyers are
easing good ole' Susan out of the picture to once again portray Paula as
this meek, little innocent who is so overwrought with emotion, but that she
is willing to be a martyr for the women's cause by going ahead with the
appeal (Where is my puke bucket, I seemed to have mislaid it--<g>).  She
must have read the law list--up there with Mother Theresa, no less.  And to
be really catty at this point, I think the "producers" of her conference
better take into consideration that a side shot is not her best angle
(meow).  I am still wondering where my $20,000 for her beauty makeover went
(I know, nasty me).  I guess it is just that I don't want what I consider
to be a "lead me around by the ring in my nose" woman representing women in
a crusade against sexual harrassment (no pun intended on this).  I
especially like the remarks from her lawyer about their willingness to
settle this out and willingness to sit down at the negotiating table.
Funny, how they are now willing.  Also loved her husband's remark that all
she is looking for is an apology--is that wrapped up in "big bucks"
packaging.  Oh well,  this all fit in well with Ken's little announcement.

jackief

jackief

William J. Foristal wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 15:04:21 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >In a message dated 98-04-17 10:01:42 EDT, you write:
> >
> ><< From my point of view this is just starting to get tired
> > and boring. >>
> >
> >Just starting?  From mine it's been that from the beginning.  And all
> >the
> >hoopla about this "news conference" -- did anyone seriously think she
> >was
> >going to announce a decision NOT to appeal?
> >Doc
>
> Hi Doc,
>
> A very well rehearsed news conference I might add.  Too bad she's not a
> good enough actress to pull it off.  If she's not interested in media
> coverage then why even HAVE a news conference?  It is certainly not a
> requirement to have one in order to appeal a court decision.  These
> people are so dumb and transparent it's hilarious.
>
> Bill
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues



--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective

I toss and turn all night.    Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"



Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to