[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
LOL...another great post! Too bad Paula is not smart enough or talented
enough to pull off the kind of acting job these right wing whacko's would
like her to pull off. But it's a Catch 22. If they found a woman smart
enough and talented enough they could not have convinced her to go along
with the false accusations in the first place.
Yeah, comments like the Mother Theresa ones simply point out people's
ignorance of the facts or unwillingness to admit the likely truth of the
matter. They like to hide behind this false facade or morality and
standing up for poor women everywhere. Too bad that people always see
them for the bombastic fools that they are. You'd think they would get
the message and begin trying to look at issues with critical thinking
rather than with the blinders or rampant prejudice and unreined bias.
That's the bane of the poor computer discussion though. All these people
who got laughed out of bars and cocktail parties turn on their computers
and express their ridculous fantasies to the unflappable computer screen.
Oh well, it does keep them off the streets. <VBG>
Bill
On Sat, 18 Apr 1998 05:06:55 -0500 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill
>
>I think the press conference was held in an attempt to change the
>image by
>removing Susan from being the spokesperson. It sounds like the
>lawyers are
>easing good ole' Susan out of the picture to once again portray Paula
>as
>this meek, little innocent who is so overwrought with emotion, but
>that she
>is willing to be a martyr for the women's cause by going ahead with
>the
>appeal (Where is my puke bucket, I seemed to have mislaid it--<g>).
>She
>must have read the law list--up there with Mother Theresa, no less.
>And to
>be really catty at this point, I think the "producers" of her
>conference
>better take into consideration that a side shot is not her best angle
>(meow). I am still wondering where my $20,000 for her beauty makeover
>went
>(I know, nasty me). I guess it is just that I don't want what I
>consider
>to be a "lead me around by the ring in my nose" woman representing
>women in
>a crusade against sexual harrassment (no pun intended on this). I
>especially like the remarks from her lawyer about their willingness to
>settle this out and willingness to sit down at the negotiating table.
>Funny, how they are now willing. Also loved her husband's remark that
>all
>she is looking for is an apology--is that wrapped up in "big bucks"
>packaging. Oh well, this all fit in well with Ken's little
>announcement.
>
>jackief
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
