Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc:
I agree with you on this one. Saddam has proven in the past that he
cannot be trusted. He also had plenty of time to hide any weapons that
he had, before the UN was allowed back in.
If he honestly destroyed these weapons, there should be some type of
proof somewhere. And if not, better safe than sorry on this one.
> It's not hard to prove a negative, Ron -- it's practically impossible. So on
> that score I agree with you. I'm just not ready to accept that lack of proof
> as, in itself, proof that the opposite is not true. I'd rather spend money in
> needless safety initiatives than I would do the opposite.
> Doc
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
