[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 13:20:16 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>And such selective faith! Clinton denies Paula Jones's allegations
>and
>>denies that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky and that he asked her to
>lie
>>for him. I say we should stop sending our money to the Starrs and
>get
>>out. :)
>>
>>Bill
>
>Bill, you are wrong yet again. Starr is attempting to prove a
>positive,
>that Clinton and company suborned perjury. The onus is on Clinton to
>try to
>prove that he did not suborn perjury, and that negative can never be
>proven.
>I have no faith in Saddam, but I have less than no faith in Clinton.
>Also
>you are comparing apples to oranges...it is costing millions per day
>in the
>Gulf, millions per year for Starr to wade through all the evasiveness
>and
>lies to get to the truth. Ron
HI Ron,
LOL...you made my point for me. The onus should NOT be on Clinton to
prove he did not commit these alleged acts because it's impossible to
prove a negative. The onus is on Starr to prove he DID do them. And he
has failed miserably. (Assuming that if he had the goods on Clinton he
would have leaked this information like he leaked the other stuff).
As for spending money, if I had to choose I think I'd spend it keeping
Saddam neutralized rather than chasing after Clinton.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
