Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
> >
> >Bill
>
> Bill, you are wrong yet again. Starr is attempting to prove a positive,
> that Clinton and company suborned perjury. The onus is on Clinton to try to
> prove that he did not suborn perjury, and that negative can never be proven.
>
Hi Ron
I believe you have it in reverse. It is up to Starr to prove the positive, the
suborning of perjury, not up to Cinton to try to prove he did not. Remember,
innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. So this BS
about all Clinton has to do is confess up to what some people want to hear flies
against the whole principle of the cj system. He can sit and do nothing and
that is his right. Everyone jumps up and down saying that he has no special
rights as President and then turn around and deny that he should have the rights
that all the rest of us have. It sounds like some people speaketh with forked
tongues.
jackief
BTW--I wasn't aware I owned the magnetic fields--watch out everyone, who knows
what I will do with this wonderful property I now own. (Jackie's magnetic
fields--wow, give me my toys to play with--<VBG>).
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
