Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Terry:
That is one of the reasons that I believe her. If she got on the stand
and said whatever it is that is the truth, and they threw her in jail
for perjury it would be easier. But she just went through hell, rather
than to get on the stand and (as she puts it) lie.
As I said before though, you certainly know a whole lot more about this
woman and the situation than I do. But it looks like we both agree that
Susan McDougal is someones scape goat. I just wonder who's.
Sue
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> Susan McDougal has gone through grotesquely barbaric conditions and
> suffering imposed by Kenneth Starr to force her testimony before a grand
> jury. In prison she wore the uniform of snitches and child killers. She
> stayed in isolation. She says she cannot testify because if she tells the
> truth she will then be charged with perjury. This is ludicrous. If she was
> somehow convicted of perjury for telling the truth, her punishment would be
> nowhere as great as the punishment she has suffered for contempt of court
> already. And she is willing to accept more.
>
> Obviously there are some considerations that she is not telling us about.
>
> Susan is taking the fall for Clinton. What is not fully clear is why.
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
