Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
I don't know who is using, or why, Susan McDougal is being used, but I
believed her in that interview. She has stuck to her story since day
one, despite the fact that she could have saved herself from hell, like
others have done, by doing whatever it was that Starr wanted her to do.
Now that it is over, she has nothing to gain or lose and she is still
sticking to her story.
And you are right, Monica is being threatened with the same "hell" that
Susan McDougal just went through. Although I don't think that she will
end up facing the same thing simply because, how would that look to the
public. Locking up a young girl simply because she may or may not have
had sex with Clinton, and doesn't want to talk about it. I don't think
the public would stand for that for one minute.
Starr may have nothing to lose, but those Congress people have elections
to win, and from what I read and hear on TV, the majority are sick and
tired of the whole thing, and just want the government to get back to
work. All the opinion polls on the different sites, CNBC, MSNBC, CNN,
ABC, etc show that.
Sue
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> I find it amazing how some people have become so two faced about this.
> People who have spoken out quite strongly about the rights of defendants
> and the overbearing power of the authorities now sing a different tune
> when it comes to McDougal. Again, their blatant prejudices and biases
> come through and render their arguments meaningless. Instead of
> wondering if McDougal was taking a fall for Clinton, these bigoted
> hypocrites should retain some semblance of consistency and question why
> the system was allowed to abuse McDougal by giving her worse treatment
> than a non-political defendant would get for the same charge.
>
> It seems the Mr. Starr is not above asking people to lie for him or face
> the consequences of his unfettered powers. Monica Lewinsky is now going
> through the same hell that McDougal has gone through. Again, it's the
> case of staring at a tree too long and then leaving a pile of crap next
> to it expecting others to believe it. But I know that YOU aren't fooled
> one bit here. :)
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
