[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
I find it amazing how some people have become so two faced about this.
People who have spoken out quite strongly about the rights of defendants
and the overbearing power of the authorities now sing a different tune
when it comes to McDougal. Again, their blatant prejudices and biases
come through and render their arguments meaningless. Instead of
wondering if McDougal was taking a fall for Clinton, these bigoted
hypocrites should retain some semblance of consistency and question why
the system was allowed to abuse McDougal by giving her worse treatment
than a non-political defendant would get for the same charge.
It seems the Mr. Starr is not above asking people to lie for him or face
the consequences of his unfettered powers. Monica Lewinsky is now going
through the same hell that McDougal has gone through. Again, it's the
case of staring at a tree too long and then leaving a pile of crap next
to it expecting others to believe it. But I know that YOU aren't fooled
one bit here. :)
Bill
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998 15:18:18 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Terry:
>
>That is one of the reasons that I believe her. If she got on the
>stand
>and said whatever it is that is the truth, and they threw her in jail
>for perjury it would be easier. But she just went through hell,
>rather
>than to get on the stand and (as she puts it) lie.
>
>As I said before though, you certainly know a whole lot more about
>this
>woman and the situation than I do. But it looks like we both agree
>that
>Susan McDougal is someones scape goat. I just wonder who's.
>
>Sue
>>
>> Hi Sue,
>>
>> Susan McDougal has gone through grotesquely barbaric conditions and
>> suffering imposed by Kenneth Starr to force her testimony before a
>grand
>> jury. In prison she wore the uniform of snitches and child killers.
> She
>> stayed in isolation. She says she cannot testify because if she
>tells the
>> truth she will then be charged with perjury. This is ludicrous. If
>she was
>> somehow convicted of perjury for telling the truth, her punishment
>would be
>> nowhere as great as the punishment she has suffered for contempt of
>court
>> already. And she is willing to accept more.
>>
>> Obviously there are some considerations that she is not telling us
>about.
>>
>> Susan is taking the fall for Clinton. What is not fully clear is
>why.
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
