"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: . If he is not guilty, however, he does not need to take any chances with public sentiment and opinion that might be turned against him if he issues a pardon to McDougal. Bill Now you got me ROTFLMAO, because you just stuck your foot in your mouth with the above statement. If he is not guilty...., she could testify, tell the truth and no pardon would be necessary! Ron 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... hallinan
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in A... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial ... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Tr... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes o... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness G... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... hallinan
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in A... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in A... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in A... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in A... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... hallinan
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkans... Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in A... William J. Foristal
