"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


.  If he is not guilty, however, he does not need to take any
chances with public sentiment and opinion that might be turned against
him if he issues a pardon to McDougal.
Bill

Now you got me ROTFLMAO, because you just stuck your foot in your mouth with
the above statement.  If he is not guilty...., she could testify, tell the
truth and no pardon would be necessary!   Ron

 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to