Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Dr. L.: All I answered was "Yes", "Please". LOL Sue > > Direct exam: What if anything did you want Kathy to do? > Opposition counsel: objection, leading. > Witness: I wanted (as to state of mind) a summary from Kathy. > Cross Exam: Isn't it true you wanted Kathy to do a summary? > Opposition Counsel: Objection, asked and answered. > Witness: I thought I said that... > Judge: Counsel approach. > ----------------------Kathy E wrote:---------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- L&I Another Woman Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Another Woman Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Another Woman Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Another Woman Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Another Woman Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Another Woman Kathy E
- Re: L&I Another Woman Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Dr. L. [Ph.d., J.D.]
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Kathy E
- Re: L&I Another Woman Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Another Woman Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Another Woman William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Another Wom... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Another Wom... Sue Hartigan
