Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue and Dr. L
Here comes the ole' devil's advocate here.
Question: if Willey was so concerned about her husband's whereabouts, why
was she making an appointment to see the President to ask for a job??
Wouldn't she be trying to find out where he was?? Where did the husband
commit suicide (home, office, ?).
Second question: if Willey was one of the Clintons friends, which it sounds
like they were, and Bill was really the 'womanizer--no time for work, only
sexual games guy' that people are alleging, then she would surely be aware
of his reputation--why would she believe he wouldn't do the same to her ??
("I just couldn't believe this was happening") Remember she asked for the
meeting, and I guess as a female I learned very young how to avoid
situations where I had to be alone with a man who was a known
womanizer--brought a friend, wandered in and sat down in a more public area
to talk with him, etc.. This is not to excuse his behavior if he really is
doing these things--hanging by his genitals might be an appropriate
punishment. (I wonder though how he got this far in public life if he was
as horney as is implied by all these "true confessions" we are hearing today
and had such poor lack of control over his physical responses. All I see is
a walking "h#$%-on" if all these stories are to be believed. (I apologise
for my language here).
Her story credible--yes, so was Mata Hari. Her telling of the story
theatrical--yes. The makeup was perfect, the hesitant little wounded victim
demeanor was perfect, her emotions needed a little more rehearsal.
Now to poor, maligned Bill, if you believe the w.h.. His story
credible--not really. His telling of the story theatrical--yes. I couldn't
have cast a better actor for the soap opera we are now staying tuned to on a
daily basis, especially weekends when we know something will break. "Days
at the Oval House" should win an emmy this year, I would think.
jackief
Sue Hartigan wrote:
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Dr. L.:
>
> I'm not too good at doing that, but maybe we could get Kathy to do it.
> She is wonderful when it comes to those sorts of things.
>
> I was impressed with this woman. I still haven't taken her word as
> being the absolute truth, but I can't discount her either.
>
> She sounded very sincere, and her story did sound very plausible, IMO.
> And she certainly didn't fit the image that we have been having of these
> women who are telling these stories. She was more mature, and came
> across as not the kind of woman who would be soliciting sexual advances.
>
> Someone here is lying, and the problem now is to find out which one. If
> it is the President then he should step down, and let the country get
> back to what it should be doing. I just don't know how we are ever
> going to find out who it is though that is lying. :(
>
> It certainly was a bad day for Clinton, that is for sure. His own
> Friday the 13th.
>
> One thing that I did notice about Ms. Willey, she mentioned that her
> husband was in real financial problems because he had stolen money from
> some of his clients. This was a similar problem that Susan McDougal
> had. What is it with these people that the President was friends with
> anyway. Are they all a bunch of crooks?
>
> Also another thing that came up was that the Presidents lawyer said that
> when Ms. Willey came to the WH that day, she was upset because she had
> no idea where her husband was. *She* said that while she was at the WH
> her husband committed suicide. Those two stories sort of go together,
> IMO
>
> Sue
>
> >
> > Hi - I missed it; could you sum up the 60 minutes program along with
> > which of the several women were interviewed? Thanks a lot, ") LDMF.
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
