Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sooz:
I was just thinking how I would react in the same circumstance. And
since there was no rape or anything like that, and since they had been
friends for a long time it wouldn't be the sort of thing that would be
the most important thing on my mind when I heard that my husband had
killed himself. (On the same day.)
And during the months, I'm sure that she talked to both Hillary and
Clinton himself concerning sympathy, and other things relating to
getting her back on her feet, this original situation just faded into
the background during this time. If there was no repeating of it, then
it became a nonissue. I doubt that she forgot about it, it just didn't
seem that important any longer to her.
Just an idea.
Sue
> I was thinking along those lines myself. I can't imagine that anything
> would be
> more important to a person than the death of a spouse or child and under
> the circumstances one would not be able to think about anything else.
> Even something like that which, if you believe what she says, is
> shocking and abhorent. And I believe that it would take months, maybe
> years, to get back to "normal" and get on with your life. Thankfully I
> don't have first hand experience but under the same circumstances I
> imagine that the incident she described would be the last thing I would
> be thinking about. The word "inconsequential" is a very good
> description of the place it would take in my mind under the same
> circumstances. And I don't say that lightly...I think it would be
> horrible thing to to experience.
>
> Sooz
--
May the leprechauns be near you to spread luck along your way. And may
all the Irish angels smile upon you this St. Patrick's Day.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
