DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


In a message dated 98-05-05 11:01:29 EDT, you write:

<< For what it's worth I think you and Ron are absolutely correct on this
 one.  The newspaper stories I've been reading clearly present the reality
 of the situation with respect to this issue.  A lot of time and
 additional research must be conducted before they will be close to
 determining that this drug will be effective in curing some types of
 cancer in humans.  But the breakthrough in the animal testing is
 certainly a tremendous achievement and is deserving of a lot of medial
 coverage.
 
 I wish I had bought Entremed the day before this was announced and then
 sold it when it hit $80 a share.  Timing is everything.
  >>
Actually it closed at something like $57, but still that's way over the $12 it
was going for earlier.
One of our commentators remarked that it's a wonder no one thought of the "cut
off the blood supply" approach before, and when I started to think about that
it rings true.  They've been doing it (experimentally?  Ron?) for uterine
fibroids and it seems to work well there, so why not for other solid tumors?
I think it will be several years, maybe as few as five or as many as ten,
before this is ready to be marketed if it does prove workable.  But a hoax it
is NOT!
Cec

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to