Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Ron:
They aren't saying that the work, or the cure is the problem, it is the
way it is being reported.
"The widespread reactions from patients have raised questions
about how the media report word of preliminary medical advances."
And you as a doc should know more than anyone that as soon as a new
drug, etc is put into the media you are overwhelmed with phone calls.
Look what is happening to the docs and pharmacy's with the Viagara.
I think that the reporting of these things should really be done with a
lot more caution. But it doesn't mean that the study is a hoax.
Sue
> "The widespread reactions from patients have raised questions
> about how the media report word of preliminary medical advances.
> Those questions were deepened in the current case by confirmation
> from several publishing houses that the New York Times reporter
> whose story kicked off the current fever had circulated a book
> proposal about the alleged cancer cure--only to withdraw it
> Tuesday. "
>
> It sounds to me as if two soldiers in their bunkers, should think about
> eating a little crow and apologizing to Terry Hallinan. The critics of the
> media even use the world cruel, but since cruel is an adjective, hoax may be
> implied. The hoax was not from the researchers, but from the media...a
> deliberate attempt to deceive. Ron
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
