On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 21:12 +0200, Darius Blaszyk wrote: > On May 14, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 19:24 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 14 May 2011, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > >>> Is that a matter of days or weeks? Because else we can commit the > >>> lnet-light version for now. It's not very easy to work with two people > >>> on a project, using numbered zip files in a bug tracker as versioning > >>> system... > >> > >> It is a matter of days. Server is already done, I am now testing it. > >> HTTP Client should be even more simple. > >> > >> I don't know what you're talking about "zip files" ? > >> I commit everything I do in subversion. > > > > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19335 > > > > This is why I offered the patch as a "final" patch. Only a couple of cleanups > left and it will be eligible for committing. > > Items that need sorting: > > - lnet : we will either need to wait for Michaels solution or use the lnet > light code. I would vote for the first option personally, but if Lazarus core > devels agree we can add the lnet light code. > - add a FPC version check to the code
I have made two changes to make it work within the IDE. 1: laz_pkgcommands have to be added in the uses somewhere, to register the lazarus commands. 2: when the TFppkgForm is created, the global FppkgForm variable as to be used, because this variable is used in LazLog to show the log-messages in the form. And a check in LazLog has to be added to check that FppkgForm is assigned. Joost -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
