On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:05:15 +0200, Joost van der Sluis <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 21:12 +0200, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On May 14, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 19:24 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 14 May 2011, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
>>> Is that a matter of days or weeks? Because else we can commit
the
>>> lnet-light version for now. It's not very easy to work with two
people
>>> on a project, using numbered zip files in a bug tracker as
versioning
>>> system...
>>
>> It is a matter of days. Server is already done, I am now testing
it.
>> HTTP Client should be even more simple.
>>
>> I don't know what you're talking about "zip files" ?
>> I commit everything I do in subversion.
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19335
>
This is why I offered the patch as a "final" patch. Only a couple of
cleanups left and it will be eligible for committing.
Items that need sorting:
- lnet : we will either need to wait for Michaels solution or use
the lnet light code. I would vote for the first option personally, but
if Lazarus core devels agree we can add the lnet light code.
- add a FPC version check to the code
I have made two changes to make it work within the IDE.
1: laz_pkgcommands have to be added in the uses somewhere, to
register
the lazarus commands.
2: when the TFppkgForm is created, the global FppkgForm variable as
to
be used, because this variable is used in LazLog to show the
log-messages in the form. And a check in LazLog has to be added to
check
that FppkgForm is assigned.
Thanks I added both. I also created a new Laz_ExecuteAction and enabled
the lnet light code (you forgat to add a file). I will create a new
patch now.
Regards, Darius
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
