On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 August 2011 16:38, Martin wrote: >> >> Are you sure? >> Have you compared speed to 0.9.28? And which actions have you used for >> checking speed? > > Yet, at least between a 0.9.29 binary I had lying around, and 0.9.30.1 > > In the days of 0.9.26 and 0.9.28 I used the GTK1 interface. At that > point LCL-GTK1 was considerably faster than the LCL-GTK2 - in the > editor, dialogs, and general screen updates. > > I know LCL-GTK2 has come a long way since then. > > When I say slower, in this test case I can not the following. > > - Loading time of all tabs (eg: when I tested with 100 or 200 units) > - tab / editor screen update. The editor was "blank" for the duration > of loading > those units. MSEide was instant with near zero screen flicker. > > My other concern was memory consumption. I know I have no clue as to > what Lazarus IDE everything does, but I can say that for the generate > usage of loading a project with some 5-15 units open, code navigating > here and there etc.. the memory consumption of Lazarus is by > magnitudes more than MSEide. Regarding what I was test or using in the > editor, both IDE's had the same functionality. > > > -- > Regards, > - Graeme - >
Question: do you have "Open designer on open unit" preference enabled? -Flávio -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
