Rich Saunders schrieb:
On 2/29/12 7:35 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
So, what does the management mean in practice? Should Lazarus be
managed differently from how it is managed now?
IMO it's not so much a matter of management, but of mind shift. The
developers should share more of their knowledge, apart from only
writing code. Until then every management attempt will be ineffective.
BTW this is not a criticism on Lazarus only, I found that attitude in
many open source projects, and small (one-man) companies. Failure to
educate co-workers is usually justified by a lack of time ("busy with
more important things"), and results in never decreasing work load.
While you have identified one issue that may not be helped by a change
in project management, there are other issues that will be helped. So
don't just focus on this one thing and say "every management attempt
will be ineffective".
I wonder what's the intented purpose of your "management". In my
understanding a management will give instructions, which then are
*obeyed*. Everything else is "talk" about a project, which can happen in
any place (mailing list, forums...).
DoDi
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
