On 2014-06-27 19:53, Giuliano Colla wrote: > You need tons of workarounds to make them work under Lazarus, and to > comply with native widgesets features and bugs. Just to mention a few:
That is a very similar experience I had with LCL. My applications required a lot of visual customisation, and LCL simply wasn't up to the task. And like you said, things break often between versions. Also the inconsistency between LCL widgetsets was a real nightmare. CLX was definitely more consistent between Windows and Linux. I guess LCL-Qt is probably the closest equivalent to CLX. But do people actually use LCL-Qt under Windows? Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
