On Jan 23, 2008 7:45 PM, Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that using a ready made widgetset is a good way to start a
> project which otherwise would appear a titanic task. But once the
> project has started consolidating, as it has, I believe it should be
> wise to reconsider the initial choices.
I think that the LCL model is flexible enougth: Those that think we
shouldn't use native widgets can work on a fpgui or a msegui interface
for lazarus.
> You're right, but the more intricate is the pattern, the more difficult
> is the approach. I've fixed a number of Kylix bugs in a fraction of the
> time it just took me just to locate in Lazarus the gkt functions
> involved in a bug.
I don't think this can be generalized to LCL as a whole. If you try to
develop the Qt or Win32 interface you'll see it's much easier.
I already said my oppinion on gtk and the gtk interface many times, so
I won't repeat myself.
regards,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
