|
Hi,
Despite version 1.11 seems to be very stable, there
have been reports of several
minor bugs. None of them are worth of a new
revision, but taken together probably
makes sense to
join all changes into a new release.
At that point, I would like to do a change on the
license. Many people has asked for
a more liberal license than LGPL. That is ok for
most small projects, but for corporate
use or for embedding in firmware it has some
difficulties.
So, I am willing to change the current LGPL license
to MIT license:
I hardly believe this will be in benefit of all us.
But before doing that, I would like to
ask if anyone would be negatively affected by that.
I cannot find any reason for
that, anyway.
Regards,
|
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new release Marti Maria
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new release Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new release John Cupitt
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new release Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new release Daniel Rogers
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new relea... Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new r... Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [Lcms-user] need for a n... Marti Maria
