For curiosity, could someone explain the commercial objections to LGPL (or suggest a link)? Libraries such as gtk are LGPL and they seem to used commercially without problems (as far as I know).

John

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Marti Maria wrote:

At that point, I would like to do a change on the license. Many
people has asked for a more liberal license than LGPL. That is ok
for most small projects, but for corporate use or for embedding in
firmware it has some difficulties.

So, I am willing to change the current LGPL license to MIT license:

http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php




------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user

Reply via email to