Hi,

Bob is right. As probably you have figured out, a change in the 
license is not trivial at all. Aside the required changes in the source 
files, packages and so, I must also edit the website and  descriptions in 
SourceForge, Fresh meat, etc.

Another issue are the collaborations. lcms has been active since 1998,
and in all that time I have received hundreds of contributions. From the
simplest "hey, this doesn't work!" to big parts of package, like that one 
Bob kindly sent. I am very grateful for that, but asking for permission 
to everyone is, frankly, near impossible.

In part, this is why my first message about license change. If anybody has
any objection, please don't hesitate to told me. This is specially valid
for contributors. I will assume everybody agrees if no message on that 
got posted. I will wait all next wee, until December 1 to make the 1.12
release.

And FYI, that is going to have some new functions among license change
and bugfixes. There is black point compensation in postscript CRD, additional
information functions, profile ID handling (v4), an abstract virtual profile for 
controlling bright/contrast/hue/saturation and sequence descriptor tag support 
for devicelink profiles.

 Best Regards,
Marti Maria
The little cms project
http://www.littlecms.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Friesenhahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daniel Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lcms-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] need for a new release


By the way, my opinion on the LCMS license topic is that the authors
of LCMS select the license that the package uses. Marti Maria is the
principle author of LCMS.  Marti should consult with any other
significant contributors to LCMS to obtain their agreement before
changing the license since the prior work was submitted under the LGPL
license.  Without copyright assignment from these significant
contributors, by law these contributors retain the copyright to their
work.  There are significant issues if the licence is altered without
agreement from the copyright holders.

The UNIXish build environment I contributed for LCMS 1.11 (a
significant work) was submitted under the LGPL license, but I hereby
assign the rights to this work to Marti Maria to be distrubuted under
any appropriate open source license (approved by the Open Source
Initiative) he may choose to apply to LCMS.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user

Reply via email to