Bob Friesenhahn schrieb:
Argyll is GPL, which prevents its use for some situations. I am a bit concerned that it seems that Argyll is "experimental" software so releases may not occur very often.
I agree.
The reason why I think so is that since Photoshop's CMS is designed specifically for use in Photoshop there is no reason for performance to be lost due to generality. That means that parts of it may be coded in assembly language, and time spent marshalling data can be kept to a minimum.
Photoshop's CMS implementation has no need for a general purpose data-marshaller like LCMS provides.
I understand what you mean, but I'm not sure if the overhead is really that big.
(Btw, it looks like Marti has also coded some stuff in assembly language, but appearently for Windows only. So I'm also wondering how much LCMS runs faster on Windows than on Linux)
Gerhard
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
