We can live with that. :) Would be interested in any stories from the field. Notes on provisioning. Performance.
--- Puryear Information Technology, LLC Baton Rouge, LA * 225-706-8414 http://www.puryear-it.com Author: "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers" "Spam Fighting and Email Security in the 21st Century" Download your free copies: http://www.puryear-it.com/publications.htm Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:59:50 PM, you wrote: > --On Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:57 PM -0600 Dustin Puryear > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about Microsoft AD Application >> Mode (ADAM). >> >> The Microsoft KB article: >> http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/f/?en/library/2a678533-a3c9-4 >> 758-ab8f-c52477fc5c001033.mspx >> >> We are looking at two major applications that will rely on ADAM. So, >> we are beginning to delve a little more into ADAM, with focus on >> provisioning, ACLs, performance, LDAP-friendliness, and availability. >> >> By "LDAP-friendliness", I mean how well ADAM works with existing LDAP >> applications and management tools. >> >> Any ADAM-stories would be welcome. :) > It still isn't fully LDAP compliant. Either "cn" or "sn" is only allowed > to be single-valued, I forget which. > --Quanah > -- > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Developer > ITS/Shared Application Services > Stanford University > GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html --- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
