Hi, I made a benchmark between 4 Directory servers some time ago. (Novell, SUN, OpenLDAP and MS ADAM).
The performance for a query is not bad at all, only the schema is extremely rigid and there are few possibilities to tune the performance (indexing is not documented) and in my opinion is not the best choice if you need some flexibility. Interesting is the size for the download file: while Novell and SUN deliver their products with 100MB-file, the dowload size of ADAM is just 8 MB. regards Giovanni mit freundlichen Grüßen Giovanni Baruzzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2007 21:38 An: [email protected] Cc: Dustin Puryear Betreff: [ldap] Re: Re[2]: Microsoft ADAM --On Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:33 PM -0600 Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can live with that. :) > > Would be interested in any stories from the field. Notes on > provisioning. Performance. We have some interest in deploying an ADAM server, but it has not been a high priority in management so far. Simply as an alternative for windowsish systems that don't really understand LDAP. I'm curious about performance as well, although I can't imagine it'd touch OpenLDAP's throughput. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Developer ITS/Shared Application Services Stanford University GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html --- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message. --- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
