On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:25:00AM -0600, John Finlay wrote:

> I am implementing the addition of _UID's to PhpGedView for future
> integration with the new FamilySearch APIs.  
> 
> The Perl algorithm that was shown on this list only adds _UID's to INDI
> and FAM record types.  Shouldn't _UID's also be added to SOUR, REPO,
> OBJE, and other level 0 GEDCOM records types?

I just followed the guidelines in
http://www.familysearchdevnet.org/downloads/gedcom/FS-TT1001.doc which
said:

  1.    Each individual and family record in your database should be
        assigned a UID.

Adding a _UID to HEAD or TRLR records makes little sense.  Probably not
for SUBN either, since there can be only one of them.

For OBJE, NOTE, REPO, SOUR and SUBM I can see an argument for them.

-- 
Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjcj.net
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

Reply via email to