"Scott C. Best" wrote: > > 1. What were your design considerations in regards to putting the > authorization info and server on the firewall itself? The > alternatives are harder, but strike me as possibly more secure > than putting such important stuff on boxes whose physical > security cannot be assured.
In a typical setup, no sensitive information is stored on the firewall machine (or gateway, as we call it), so I'm afraid I don't understand your question. > 2. Any thoughts about HereUAre.com? I met with them last year > down in Santa Clara, CA., though nothing came of it. Don't know anything about it, but last we heard they were trying to make money on a public radio band, so we weren't especially interested. > 3. I was curious if you've looked at LaBrea at all, to tarpit the > unused IP's on the WLAN until someone authenticates with your > NoCatAuth. Never looked at it before you mentioned it, but I'd say it's basically outside the scope of our project. Other wireless groups have expressed an interest in RIDS, to prevent luser antics on the wireless network, and our attitude is basically the same. We do require transparent port forwarding on the gateway firewall, however. Keep 'em coming. :-) SDE _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
