N. Sean Timm wrote:

> Well, I finally got around to trying out this latest version,

...excellent!

> but I
> didn't have a lot of luck getting it running.

I'll see if I can help.

> I had to edit the "network" file because the CIPD
> (or something like that) variable was tacking on an extra '/' to the ip,
> so it was ending up with something like '192.168.1.2//3' (something like
> that...you get the idea).

That should be fixed in the most recent versions using the new ipmask
binary.  I'll check.  THe most recent I think is 0827.

> Fixing that got my network going, but I
> didn't get too much further.  Logging didn't appear to be working, so I
> couldn't see anything that was going on.

Can you explain further?  Was syslogd and klogd running?

> I could ping my gateway (DSL
> router) and my internal network, but I couldn't access any other IPs.

Remember several things: 1) ping fails in at least FOUR different
ways... 2) Oxygen routers are not configured to answer to pings.

> Also, I had some trouble getting the latest dnscache.lrp working...(not
> that it mattered while I couldn't hit the external network).  :)

You didn't get that from the Oxygen distribution :)

> The syslinux.cfg seemed to indicate that it supported a CONF=myfile.cnf,
> but it didn't seem to like that keyword,

It should work; what are the messages?

> but I noticed that you could
> specify a conf attribute in each config declaration, so I got around
> that.

Not sure what you mean by that...

> I had to change the umount call of the apkg script...it was
> failing when I did an 'apkg -b' because it was trying to umount $DEV
> rather than the variable that it had been mounted as.

This is a bug in busybox 0.60.0; umount "sees through links" so that
mounting /dev/boot results in /dev/fd0u1680 being mounted, and a umount
/dev/boot fails.  I'm going to upgrade to 0.60.1 soon.

> BTW, has the kernal been compiled with ipsec support?

No.

> Also, is there a newer version of ipsec.lrp floating around anywhere?

Probably.  I never compiled ipsec; check Charles Steinkuehler's site at
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net and see.

> Anyway, I don't know if this is useful information to anyone, but I
> thought I'd pass it along.  I'm looking forward to this latest version
> once things get stabilized.

I'm working on it.  This information is VERY helpful - thanks!

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to