On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 08:01, Lynn Avants wrote: > With some playing, I'm starting to agree with this to a point. A tree that > contained '/path/variable/value' would be simple to set and change. > However pairing the variable/value might not be too fun to use in > the files that use this infomation. Considering this, if there was an > added single db file that would concentrate the tree db information, > there would be an option to easily find 'where' to change a value > (by hand) and location to source for the run-time packages themselves.
Lynn, Maybe (probably) I'm confused, but I thought one of the main advantages of Chad's suggestion was it avoided the use of a single file database. ref. http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg06143.html -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
