On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 12:37, Lynn Avants wrote: > On Thursday 06 February 2003 11:19 am, Mike Noyes wrote: > > Lynn, > > Maybe (probably) I'm confused, but I thought one of the main advantages > > of Chad's suggestion was it avoided the use of a single file database. > > Mike, your not confused at all. > I'm a bit confused to how nothing but a directory structure containing nothing > but a 'value' is going to be parsed/sourced with onboard LEAF tools for use > in conf files w/o templates. Further, how is Joe User going to locate > something by hand if he needs to. I see a single file (not the real db) as > being very useful as a translation layer between user/application and the > db.
Well, I must have sent through a very confusing message earlier today that seemed like I had attached code but in fact did not. Luckily, I forgot to attach the code at all, so everybody got to see how insane I am rather than the list denying the mime mail. Hmmm, let's try this again. You can see the code by checking it out from the leaf sourceforge repository at: devel/ccarr/devel/leaf-cdb All of the previous description still applies. Sorry for the insanity, but I am tremendously overworked. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
