Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 22:01:17 schrieb Andrew:
> 30.10.2010 22:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>> Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew:
> >>>> 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>>>> What about the kernel??
> >>>>> kp
> >>>> 
> >>>> IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one - for legacy i486 or
> >>>> Geode (or even separate kernels), and one - with SMP, more than 4GB
> >>>> memory support (at least - for PAE enabling, for NX bit) for PentiumII
> >>>> or higher.
> >>> 
> >>> I agree, but IMHO it's a long/middle term goal (beta2 or 3).
> >>> To get a beta 1 done I think a generic kernel based on the 486
> >>> processor will be enough for a start (the Bering-uClibc series worked
> >>> out well, with only one kernel - no objection, if we improve it during
> >>> the release cycle).
> >>> 
> >>> I believe the main target for beta1 is to detect remaining bugs and to
> >>> provide a proof-of-concept (or slightly more  - I run Bering-uClibc4
> >>> for weeks in production).
> >>> 
> >>> Different kernels are nice-to-have, but IMHO it requires a lot more
> >>> work, thoughts and testing - and esp. for testing, users who started
> >>> to use Bering- uClibc4 (with the first beta).
> >>> 
> >>> kp
> >> 
> >> It isn't too hard to built some packages for different kernel arch
> >> without deep config cleaning (just one like current i686 with SMP but
> >> possible with 64GB RAM support - for PAE and dependent NX bit support,
> >> and one generic i486 w/o SMP - like your), later we can do clean-up. 1st
> >> kernel will be very suitable for ISPs (like as own company), and 2nd
> >> kernel - for small devices like Alix board. I think that enough ISPs
> >> needed something like this - and some of them tried to develop their own
> >> distro (for ex., GlobalOS by nuclearcat - which isn't modular, is huge
> >> comparable to Bering-uClibc, has no documentation except one very tine
> >> howto page + forum thread, and it's configs are poor).
> >> 
> >> Also, i686 SMP kernel is tested and looks stable (i use it under enough
> >> heavy loads - after GCC update to 4.4.5 no troubles noticed), i486 -
> >> even still not assembled.
> > 
> > Andrew;
> > 
> > no doubt that different kernels and esp. a
> > fully-686-SMP-"whatever"-optimized one are a huge benefit. I also like
> > the Geode enhancements for the Alix system I use.
> > 
> > I don't know how easy it'll be to build different kernels (and related
> > packages) with buildtool yet and how to provide, just never done that
> > before.
> 
> IMHO it isn't so hard. It just requires modification of EXTRAVERSION in
> kernel Makefile + config replacement before building for each arch; +
> modify modules path for initrd and moddb (make two packages, like for
> v3.x different versions). I'll try this tomorrow.

Ok, let's see what you'll find out... 

> > I also understand that your 686 kernel seems as well tested as the geode
> > one.
> > 
> > My main point is that we should start with a kernel for beta1, that
> > anyone can use, regardless the processor he runs LEAF  - the most common
> > denominator. And to walk from there to more special kernels later.
> > 
> > That way the user base, who can testdrive beta1 would be as great as
> > possible. A beta1 that just runs out of the box for a 686 processor
> > sounds to me to unnecessarily restrict the possible user base.
> > 
> > kp
> 
> Providing generic i486 non-SMP version of distro, we'll also reduce
> users base, especially qualified users like ISP system administrators.

It's no question, that I'd like to support those as well.
But I do not expect ISP system administrators running a beta1 in production. I 
believe they want to testdrive a largely overhauled version in a testbed and 
see if it's bug-free.

If it won't be that hard to produce different kernels, it'll be fine with me.

kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to