Vlad

The Symbol cards design is not what we have :)  Our cards use the Prism
2.5 MAC and are 100% compatible with any Prism driver, but we have
different second stage internal AMP's and RF chips that make this a much
better quality cards that the ones based on the Prism 2.5 ref design.

Sincerely
Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group
Office: 908-996-7995
Cell: 908-246-9170
Fax: 908-847-0202
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.demarctech.com
Wireless Solution Provider


-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir I. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Tony
Cc: 'Zachariah Mully'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] WISP and orinoco wireless?



Yes, sure I wasn't specific. Cards sold by DemarcTech are completely
different 
design than XI-300.

Symbol also has 100mW Spectrum24 Prism-based cards; I might be wrong but
I think 
that DemarcTech cards are based on the same design.

Tony wrote:
> Vlad
> 
> Thanks for the update, also I can tell you that the card from TT are 
> not exactly the same as the one s from Zcomax/Demarc. We have a level 
> of quality the cards must meet and pay for this service, this will be 
> very prevalent on the 200mW cards. FYI we also have the PCMCIA 
> adaptors available.
> 
> Also yes I can 100% confirm the heating problem on the Senao cards, we

> found this out while doing FCC testing on our cards. We test many 
> while we where there, we notices the 200mW Senao droped to 110mW when 
> they got hot.
> 
> Sincerely
> Tony Morella
> Demarc Technology Group
> Office: 908-996-7995
> Cell: 908-246-9170
> Fax: 908-847-0202
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.demarctech.com
> Wireless Solution Provider
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vladimir 
> I.
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:30 AM
> To: Zachariah Mully
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-user] WISP and orinoco wireless?
> 
> 
> Not all Prism cards are born equal. :-) How everything performs 
> depends on the hardware and firmware used. The one I use and test come

> from Teletronics/Zcomax
> (XI-300) and Demarctech. I prefer to use PCMCIA-PCI adapter instead of
> PLX (I 
> use the one from Teletronics).
> 
> I know that D-Link 650 (not the plus version, which is based on 
> another
> chipset) 
> gives problems for some people, but I suspect it may depend on the
> motherboard used.
> 
> Beware of the 200mw Senao cards which recently appeared on the market.

> They are for light office use only and quickly overheat.
> 
> Zachariah Mully wrote:
> 
>>Vladimir-
>>      Is there a problem with PLX based cards? Just wondering because
> 
> I
> 
>>picked up a set of USR prism based cards with PLX PCI adapters (model
>>2445, $80 for two, one with an external antenna on a 4ft extension, 
>>from
>>TigerDirect) with the intention of using them with WISP. I was going
> 
> to
> 
>>start working on the node tonight, but would greatly appreciate any
> 
> tips
> 
>>for working with these cards.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Zack
>>
>>On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 09:24, Vladimir I. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Do you know if this card utilizes something like PLX adapter or has 
>>>an PCMCIA-PCI bridge?
>>>
>>>Basicly, please tell the model of the card.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Systems Engineer (RHCE)




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to