I'm delighted to see new life pumped into the discussion.
Regarding UTC-SLS, for context I might recommend Mark Calabretta's
contributions that were chiseled on the stone tablets of the original mailing
list:
"Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective":
http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/navyls/0459.html
and, "Re: The real problem with leap seconds"
http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/navyls/1625.html
(Hint, it's all a representational issue.)
Regarding the "acrimony on this list" - just like Rodents of Unusual Size, I
don't think it exists. Any apparent contention is simply the result of
short-cutting system engineering best practices. The persistent lack of
consensus reflects being forced too early into the consideration of notional
solutions. Rather, it is obvious that we should still be attending to
characterizing the complete problem space.
Leap seconds are a means to an end. Start at the end and work backwards.
Rob
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
