Le 30/12/2011 23:23, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit :
In message<[email protected]>, Rob Seaman writes:
As you say, there could be additional parameters of interest. The
ITU is proceeding with a naive (and expensive) agenda that cadence
is the same thing as angle.
Uhm, no. They are quite clearly proposing that angle isn't time any more.
I think Rob was saying just that:
"Building "better" time-of-day clocks is an exercise in accuracy to an
external waveform. TAI is a metronome. UTC is a protractor."
The proposition is equating UTC with TAI and they are different beasts.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
