leapsecs  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Steve Summit
• [LEAPSECS] The leap second on BT's speaking clock Tony Finch
• [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Ask Bjørn Hansen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken David Malone
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Tony Finch
  • [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Tom Van Baak
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Michael Shields via LEAPSECS
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Ask Bjørn Hansen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Michael.Deckers. via LEAPSECS
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken, but most implementations are broken Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds ain't broken Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Warner Losh
  • [LEAPSECS] Nope, still not broken Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds still broken Warner Losh
• [LEAPSECS] Happy Leap Second alarm Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Happy Leap Second alarm Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Happy Leap Second alarm Steve Allen
• [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second Daniel R. Tobias
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second Tom Van Baak
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Greetings from an intercalary second John Hawkinson
• [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] 2016 is not tied for second longest year ever Tony Finch
• [LEAPSECS] The POSIX Time Rationale - in the Working Group's own words Joseph Gwinn
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] The POSIX Time Rationale - in the Working Group's own words Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] The POSIX Time Rationale - in the Working Group's own words Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] The POSIX Time Rationale - in the Working Group's own words Poul-Henning Kamp
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] The POSIX Time Rationale - in the Working Group's own words Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] The POSIX Time Rationale - in the Working Group's own words Poul-Henning Kamp
• [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Harlan Stenn
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Hal Murray
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Hal Murray
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] POSIX? (was Time math libraries, UTC to TAI) Tony Finch
• Re: [LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 122, Issue 13 Jonathan Natale
• [LEAPSECS] Amazon leaps and smears Steve Allen
• [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Michael Rothwell
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Michael Rothwell
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Michael Rothwell
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Martin Burnicki
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Tom Van Baak
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Tom Van Baak
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • [LEAPSECS] next leap second Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second Michael Shields via LEAPSECS
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] next leap second John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Hal Murray
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Hal Murray
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Sanjeev Gupta
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Hal Murray
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Steve Summit
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Daniel R. Tobias
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing GERRY ASHTON
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Rob Seaman
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Tony Finch
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Preben Nørager
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Robert Jones
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Richard Clark
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Robert Jones
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Robert Jones
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] alternative to smearing Robert Jones
• [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Tom Van Baak
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI GERRY ASHTON
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Zefram
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Joseph Gwinn
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Warner Losh
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Steve Allen
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Brooks Harris
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI John Sauter
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Robert Jones
  • Re: [LEAPSECS] Time math libraries, UTC to TAI Robert Jones

• Earlier messages
• Later messages