In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Seaman writes: >On Aug 11, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>A hurried solution that ignores pertinent input is extremely unlikely >to prove acceptable. I've asked now twice, and I guess that I should get the clue from your continued non-response, but I would prefer a completely straight answer from you: Will you support a proposal that keeps leap-second (or -minutes), but mandates that they be determined 40 or 50 years in advance ? If you do, will you help write it ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
