OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects. Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE.
Notably freecwmp and easycwmp NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:17 AM, L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> wrote: > OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects. > > Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE. > > Notably freecwmp and easycwmp > > NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette. > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:11 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: >> >> what an utterly bizarre conversation to wake up to. >> >> the list is non-subscribe/public post for a reason. i dont see why >> there is a need for X mailing lists. If you dont like it, then dont read >> it. >> >> this is a development related discussion and the rules clearly state >> that we would prefer companies to hold them in public. fair enough its >> not about actual source code yet, but it aims to get people involved in >> creating such code. >> >> if there is anything we should ask people not to do, then it is having >> these 40 email threads which divert from the original topic. >> >> this is a free community project. lets keep it free and not try to >> impose any rules beyond the "be nice to each other" and "be >> open/transparent" ones. >> >> anyone still recall what OP actually wanted ? >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> On 16/06/2016 02:38, John Allen wrote: >> > Yes, I would like Eric to continue posting "here". However, I think we >> > need to define "here", I think we need a couple more lists dedicated to >> > Lede, a "I've got a question/Help list" and "the think tank list". >> > Conversation about the future direction of Lede including this >> > conversation about TR-069 should probably be held in the "think tank". >> > Whether these should be moderated or not is up to the you! >> > >> > JohnA >> > >> > >> > On 2016-06-15 6:10 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote: >> >> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >> >> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >> >> behavior. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >> >>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make >> >>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols? >> >>> >> >>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >> >>> >> >>> David Lang >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 >> >>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> >> >>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >> >>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical >> >>>> development issues. >> >>>> >> >>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail >> >>>> list >> >>>> etiquette such as found here : >> >>>> >> >>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php >> >>>> >> >>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list. >> >>>> >> >>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a >> >>>> corporate conspiracy. >> >>>> >> >>>> Free Software is meant to be free ... >> >>>> >> >>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations. >> >>>> >> >>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s) >> >>>> torques me off every time. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz >> >>>> <eschu...@prplfoundation.org> wrote: >> >>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks >> >>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in >> >>>>> addition >> >>>>> to the prplwrt list at open...@lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no >> >>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox >> >>>>> will >> >>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what >> >>>>> people >> >>>>> would prefer. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Eric >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation >> >>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org >> >>>>> eschu...@prplfoundation.org >> >>>>> cell: 920-539-0404 >> >>>>> skype: ericschultzwi >> >>>>> @EricPrpl >> >>>>> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >> >>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Lede-dev mailing list >> >>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Lede-dev mailing list >> >> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Lede-dev mailing list >> > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > > _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
