Hi Thomas, On 27-10-17, Thomas Endt wrote: > That's contrary to your statements in the start posting: > > > [...] documentation targeted at hackers, contributors, and would-be > > developers. > > [...] RFC proposal of a new developer documentation > > Links [1] [2] [3] > > [...] more focused scope: the scope is explicitly limited to developer > > documentation. > > [...] this new doc would serve as a detailed and up-to-date reference for > > OpenWrt internals, while the wiki would still be extremely useful for > > user-oriented documentation
It seems that there was a bit of confusion. What you quote here is from me, not from Javier. Also, it's from a different thread [1], in which I indeed proposed a new system from the developer documentation (only). The current thread is about how to merge the LEDE wiki and the OpenWrt wiki. Or at least, that was the initial discussion. Baptiste [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009530.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
