The navigation issues are fixed. Fixing the highlighting of partial entries will take more thought.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Craig Earls <[email protected]> wrote: > I will look into these. M-p and M-n are really next and previous xact, > not directive. But it should be consistent. > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> [ sorry if you get this twice; I think I got my `reply' commands in a >> twist. ] >> >> Craig Earls <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > OK, I have gotten all of these. I will look into handling block >> > comments as blocks. Right now it only honors them as line when >> > overlaying the highlight. >> >> Thank you! It's getting much better. The issues below are more minor, >> at least for my use, but still suboptimal... >> >> * with the attached file, navigate to the line with ";;;;; 2006" in it, >> move to the next line (C-n), hit RET to create a blank line, and start >> typing a transaction, for example "2006/01/01 Foo". Until the `F' of >> `Foo' is typed, the text is in comment-face. Similarly, when adding >> posts, for example " Assets:Bar $1" RET " Assets:Baz $-1" RET, the >> first account name is in comment-face until the double-space, and the >> second is in the same face as the amount. >> >> * having typed in a complete transaction (preceding the two price >> directive lines), everything should be in an appropriate face; thank >> you! If I now try navigating between transactions and directives, >> using M-p / M-n, there are a couple of odd bits of behaviour: >> >> - if I use M-n to go to the end of the buffer, I end up on the last >> line with no transaction highlighted. At that point, if I hit M-p, >> I don't go back to the last transaction in the file, but the >> penultimate one. I think that's odd. It's a general problem; when >> point is between transactions, it seems to be counted as being >> within the last transaction. >> >> - relatedly, if I add a couple of blank lines between the "Opening >> balance" and "Interest" transactions, and then navigate to the line >> "2006/03/10 Opening balance", I see the transaction overlay covering >> all but one of the blank lines as well as the posting lines. If I >> then go past the postings to the first blank line, the transaction >> overlay shows just that line. >> >> - with the new complete transaction before the price directive lines, >> I can navigate forward through transactions and directives with M-n. >> M-p, which I would expect to be the inverse of M-n, skips directive >> lines -- so I can navigate forward through price directives, but if >> I go one too far and try to do the inverse operation with M-p, I end >> up at the previous transaction. (This is actually substantially >> worse if I put price directives between the opening balance and the >> interest lines; if I do that, have point on the price directive >> line, and hit M-p, the cursor is moved to the new Foo transaction. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Christophe >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ledger" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ > enderw88.wordpress.com > -- Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ enderw88.wordpress.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
