I can see how that makes sense in theory but in practice it'll probably end
up only adding one more mailing-list to the To: field and users will still
post general CLI accounting questions on the Ledger list. Not convinced
it'll actually improve the crosstalk situation much. In any case, I'm
indifferent -- I read all three already.


On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:05:25AM -0800, Simon Michael wrote:
> > I announced it in today's FLOSS weekly show, and now here:
> >
> > http://plaintextaccounting.org
>
> Thanks Simon, and congrats for this first achievement!
>
> I was wondering, given the threads related to plaintextaccounting have
> been heavily cross-posted to at least 3 lists (as it was natural to do),
> would it make sense to create and promote a tool-neutral
> @plaintextaccounting.org mailing list?
>
> Have you thought about that already?
>
> Cheers.
> --
> Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o
> Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
> Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o .
> « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "hledger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to