>>>>> Martin Blais <[email protected]> writes: > I can see how that makes sense in theory but in practice it'll probably end > up only adding one more mailing-list to the To: field and users will still > post general CLI accounting questions on the Ledger list. Not convinced > it'll actually improve the crosstalk situation much. In any case, I'm > indifferent -- I read all three already.
I really don't mind if the ledger-cli mailing list becomes the "general Ledger-like" mailing list. Perhaps with subject tags to indicate when we're discussing something of interest to only one port. I welcome the cross pollination that results from people witnessing the problems other ports are dealing with. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
